WL1.S3.1.02
(WL) World Languages Targeted Benchmark Level 1 Standards Area 3—Connections Standard 3.1: Students reinforce and further their knowledge of other disciplines through the foreign language.
WL1.S3.1.02 Recognize and transfer concepts presented in the foreign language classroom for use in other disciplines (e.g., geography specific to the target culture, borrowed words and phrases: coup d’état, rodeo, Kindergarten, ipso facto).
|
Student Learning Targets:
Introduction to World Languages
(7th Grade)
|
Level I (high school course)
|
Level 2 (high school course)
|
|
Knowledge Targets
-
I can list the necessary vocabulary from the target language and identify its usage in English (e.g.; senator, Kindergarten, rodeo, chocolate, R.S.V.P, etc.).
Reasoning Targets
Skills (Performance) Targets
|
Knowledge Targets
Reasoning Targets
-
I can determine the meanings of English words based on the target language roots (e.g. puerile).
- I can use cognates to expand my English vocabulary.
-
I can apply my knowledge of culture and history in Social Sciences.
-
I can compare the target language grammar to English grammar.
Skills (Performance) Targets
|
Proficiency Scale for Intro to World Language (7th grade)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Proficiency Scale for Level I (high school course)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Proficiency Scale for Level II (high school course)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Resources
Websites
- Add resources with links, youtube or PDF
Vocabulary
|
|
|
WL1.S3.1.03
(WL) World Languages Targeted Benchmark Level 1 Standards Area 3—Connections Standard 3.1: Students reinforce and further their knowledge of other disciplines through the foreign language.
WL1.S3.1.03 Present short reports in English, orally and/or in writing, on topics studied in other disciplines (i.e., report on countries where the target language is spoken; discuss and demonstrate of musical instruments from the target culture).
|
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
Reasoning Targets
Skills (Performance) Targets
Product Targets
|
Rubric - Resources |
|
|
WL1.S3.1.04
(WL) World Languages Targeted Benchmark Level 1 Standards Area 3—Connections Standard 3.1: Students reinforce and further their knowledge of other disciplines through the foreign language.
WL1.S3.1.04 Recognize basic vocabulary and concepts on familiar topics from other disciplines when presented in the target language (e.g., food pyramid, Spanish commercials or magazine advertising).
|
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
Reasoning Targets
Skills (Performance) Targets
Product Targets
|
Rubric - Resources |
|
|
WL1.S3.2.01
(WL) World Languages Targeted Benchmark Level 1 Standards Area 3—Connections Standard 3.2: Students acquire information and recognize and access the distinctive viewpoints that are only available through the foreign language and its cultures.
WL1.S3.2.01 Read, listen to, and discuss age-appropriate material of the target cultures, such as songs, adapted folk tales, and short stories written for native speakers of the target language.
|
Student Learning Targets:
Introduction to World Languages
(7th Grade)
|
Level I (high school course)
|
Level 2 (high school course)
|
|
Knowledge Targets
Skills (Performance) Targets
|
Knowledge Targets
Skills (Performance) Targets
|
Proficiency Scale for Intro to World Language (7th grade)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Proficiency Scale for Level I (high school course)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Proficiency Scale for Level II (high school course)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Resources
Websites
- Add resources with links, youtube or PDF
Vocabulary
|
|
|
WL1.S3.2.02
(WL) World Languages Targeted Benchmark Level 1 Standards Area 3—Connections Standard 3.2: Students acquire information and recognize and access the distinctive viewpoints that are only available through the foreign language and its cultures.
WL1.S3.2.02 Use authentic sources and media to gather information from the target cultures (e.g., use media to gather information about teen movie and rock stars; collect headlines to learn what the French public is interested in related to a U.S. issue).
|
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
Reasoning Targets
Skills (Performance) Targets
Product Targets
|
Rubric - Resources |
|
|
WL1.S3.2.03
(WL) World Languages Targeted Benchmark Level 1 Standards Area 3—Connections Standard 3.2: Students acquire information and recognize and access the distinctive viewpoints that are only available through the foreign language and its cultures.
WL1.S3.2.03 Use authentic sources and media to identify the perspectives of the target cultures (e.g., create a collage that illustrates the German concept of bread; create a description of an ideal pet or partner, based on information from authentic media sources; prepare an authentic meal).
|
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
Reasoning Targets
Skills (Performance) Targets
Product Targets
|
Rubric - Resources |
|
|
WL1.S4.1.01
(WL) World Languages Targeted Benchmark Level 1 Standards Area 4—Comparisons Standard 4.1: Students demonstrate understanding of the nature of language through comparisons of the language studied and their own.
WL1.S4.1.01 Recognize differences between sound systems of language(s) studied and the native language (i.e., alphabet, cognates, letter blends).
|
Student Learning Targets:
Introduction to World Languages
(7th Grade)
|
Level I (high school course)
|
Level 2 (high school course)
|
Skills (Performance) Targets
Reasoning Targets
- I can distinguish between similar sounding terms (e.g., gens and genu, Hand and Hund).
|
Knowledge Targets
-
I can recognize the difference between the target alphabet and the English alphabet and the phonetic sounds.
-
I can define the word “cognate” and give examples; and I can properly pronounce the cognates in the target language.
-
I can recognize that words of different parts of speech can originate from a single word in the target language.
Reasoning Targets
Skills (Performance) Targets
|
Knowledge Targets
Reasoning Targets
Skills (Performance) Targets
|
Proficiency Scale for Intro to World Language (7th grade)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
The student:
- can use the sound systems of the language with current and past sounds without error.
- can use the sound system to pronounce a word that was not taught.
|
|
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
The student:
- can recognize the correct sound system of the language. (Languages can have agreed upon exceptions.)
|
- The student can identify the terms whether spoken or written.
- Students can write a word as it is dictated including special symbols (e.g. ä, ö, ü, ß)
- Students spell words aloud to class.
|
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student:
- can identify the basic sounds of the language.
|
- The student can identify whether a word refers to the singular or plural when another speaks it aloud.
- The student can say most of the terms aloud.
- The student will identify the singular and plural forms.
- Students can write a word as it is dictated excluding special symbols.
|
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
The student:
- can, with help, identify some basic sounds.
|
|
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Proficiency Scale for Level I (high school course)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Proficiency Scale for Level II (high school course)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Resources
Websites
- Add resources with links, youtube or PDF
Vocabulary
|
|
|
WL1.S4.1.02
(WL) World Languages Targeted Benchmark Level 1 Standards Area 4—Comparisons Standard 4.1: Students demonstrate understanding of the nature of language through comparisons of the language studied and their own.
WL1.S4.1.02 Identify words that have been borrowed from one language to another (i.e., jeans, computer, rodeo, kindergarten, tobacco, rendezvous, agenda).
|
Student Learning Targets:
Introduction to World Languages
(7th Grade)
|
Level I (high school course)
|
Level 2 (high school course)
|
|
|
Knowledge Targets
Reasoning Targets
-
I can give examples of English derivatives.
-
I can predict the meaning of English words.
-
I can compare the forms of words in English and the target language.
Skills (Performance) Targets
|
Proficiency Scale for Intro to World Language (7th grade)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Proficiency Scale for Level I (high school course)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Proficiency Scale for Level II (high school course)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Resources
Websites
- Add resources with links, youtube or PDF
Vocabulary
|
|
|
WL1.S4.1.03
(WL) World Languages Targeted Benchmark Level 1 Standards Area 4—Comparisons Standard 4.1: Students demonstrate understanding of the nature of language through comparisons of the language studied and their own.
WL1.S4.1.03 Recognize that cognates enhance comprehension and identify common cognates in the language they are learning (e.g., students create their own lists of cognates for reference).
|
Student Learning Targets:
Introduction to World Languages
(7th Grade)
|
Level I (high school course)
|
Level 2 (high school course)
|
|
|
Knowledge Targets
-
I can recognize base words, prefixes, and suffixes.
-
I can give the meaning of base words, prefixes, and suffixes.
Reasoning Targets
Skills (Performance) Targets
|
Proficiency Scale for Intro to World Language (7th grade)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Proficiency Scale for Level I (high school course)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Proficiency Scale for Level II (high school course)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Resources
Websites
- Add resources with links, youtube or PDF
Vocabulary
|
|
|
WL1.S4.1.04
(WL) World Languages Targeted Benchmark Level 1 Standards Area 4—Comparisons Standard 4.1: Students demonstrate understanding of the nature of language through comparisons of the language studied and their own.
WL1.S4.1.04 Recognize that a language cannot be translated word for word (e.g., seek out idioms, advertising slogans, proverbs; identify English equivalents for proverbs that mean the same but are expressed differently).
|
Student Learning Targets:
Introduction to World Languages
(7th Grade)
|
Level I (high school course)
|
Level 2 (high school course)
|
|
Knowledge Targets
Reasoning Targets
Skills (Performance) Targets
|
Reasoning Targets
Product Targets
|
Proficiency Scale for Intro to World Language (7th grade)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Proficiency Scale for Level I (high school course)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Proficiency Scale for Level II (high school course)
Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
|
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
|
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
Resources
Websites
- Add resources with links, youtube or PDF
Vocabulary
|
|
|