Middle School (TEC) Targeted Standards Standard 4 Effects of Technology: Predict cultural, social, economic, and political effects of technology.
TEC-MS.04.mod Module Score for Effects of Technology.
Modules which address this standard - May include - Confident Consumer, Future Fuels, and Plastics and Polymers.
*All Modules may not be available at all Middle Schools
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
I can find the surface area of a standard object
I can give an example of a unit of measure for length, mass or weight, and volume.
I can name three ways humans used fire.
I can list three examples of nonrenewable energy.
Reasoning Targets
I can describe cyanobacteria’s role in making energy.
I can explain two advantages of using biomass energy.
I can explain two ways waste can be used as fuel.
I can glist at least two ways water is used to generate electricity and give advantages and disadvantages of each.
I can explain the concept of conservation of mass.
I can explain advantages and limitations of recycling polymers.
Skills (Performance) Targets
I can explain how to calculate unit price.
I can calculate the unit price, given an item's price and size.
I can create an absorbancy ratio.
I can create a strength ratio.
I can draw a diagram of the geothermal activity and explain it to the teacher.
Proficiency Scale
Score
Description
Assessed Evidence
4.0
Demonstrates understanding of grade level standards consistently and independently.
Displays a very high quality
Performs with a 100% accuracy
Applies the learning very accurately
Meets expectations on all standards
Perfect Marks on performance assessments
Perfect marks on all of the module paper work or enrichment activities.
100% on Post Test
3.5
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success.
3.0
Demonstrates understanding of grade level standards consistently and independently.
Displays high quality
Performs with high accuracy
Applies the learning accurately
Meets expectations on most standards
High Marks on performance assessments
High marks on nearly all of the module paper work or enrichment activities.
90-99% on Post Test
2.5
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content).
2.0
Demonstrates partial understanding of grade level standards with or without support.
Displays basic quality
Performs with inconsistent accuracy
Applies the learning at a basic level
Partially meets expectations on all standards
Mix of upper marks on performance assessments.
High marks on nearly all of the module paper work and enrichment activities.
80 -89% on Post Test.
1.5
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content).
1.0
Demonstrates minimal understanding and does not meet grade level standards, even with support.
Displays limited quality
Performs with limited accuracy
Applies the learning at a minimal level
Does not meet expectations on some standards
Mix of middle marks on performance assessments.
Mix of middle marks on nearly all of the module paper work and enrichment activities.
70-79%on Post Test.
0.5
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content).
0.0
Even with help, the student demonstrates no understanding or skill.