TEC-MS.01.F
ND CTE Standards
Technology Education Targeted Benchmarks
Standard 01: Characteristics and Scope of Technology
TEC-MS.01.F Develop new products and systems to solve problems or to help do things that could not be done without the help of technology.
|
Student Learning Targets: 6th Grade
Knowledge Targets
- I can identify an example of technology
- I can state why technology isn't just an electronic device
- I can define technology
Application Targets
- I can build a graphic organizer that shows differences in technology products
Product Targets
- I can list different examples of technology
- I can develop a collage that portrays a variety of technology examples
6th Grade Proficiency Scale
|
Score 4.0
|
- Exceeds all expectations
- Is able to teach the lesson to other students
- Exhibits traits of being technologically literate
|
Sample Activities
|
|
|
|
Score 3.0
|
The student:
- creates a product that will illustrate the student’s knowledge of the characteristics and scope of technology
- shows correlations between technologies, ranging from simple to complex
- Sample question would be – give an example of how an item is characterized as a form of technology
- “Technology Is” Collage
- What is Technology?
|
- Displays a variety of technology applications
|
|
|
2.5
|
No major errors or omissions regarding 2.0 content and partial knowledge of the 3.0 content.
|
|
|
Score 2.0
|
There are no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes as the student:
- lists six different categories of technology (i.e. transportation, construction, medical, energy and power, communication, and manufacturing)
- defines technology as a knowledge, tool, or skill used to solve a problem
However, the student exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes.
|
- Matching items to their proper technology categories.
|
|
|
1.5
|
Partial knowledge of the 2.0 content, but major errors or omissions regarding the 3.0 content.
|
|
|
Score 1.0
|
With help, a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes and some of the more complex ideas and processes.
|
|
|
0.5
|
With help, a partial understanding of the 2.0 content, but not the 3.0 content.
|
|
Score 0.0
|
Even with help, no understanding or skill demonstrated.
|
|
|
TEC-MS.01.mod
|
 Middle School (TEC) Targeted Standards
Standard 1 Characteristics and Scope of Technology:
Recognize the characteristics and scope of technology.
TEC-MS.01.mod Module Score for Characteristics and Scope of Technology.
Modules which address this standard - May include - Biotechnology, CADD, CNC Lathe/Manufacturing, Creative Problem Solving, Digital Transportation, Electricity, Electronics, Engineering Bridges/Towers, Energy Power and Mechanics, Flight, Future Fuels, Graphic Communication, Plastics and Polymers, Practical Skills, Robots, Rocketry and Space, Video Production.
*All Modules may not be available at all Middle Schools
|
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
- I can develop products and systems that can be used to solve problems.
Reasoning Targets
- I can explain how technology is related to creativity.
Skills (Performance) Targets
- I can utilize innovation to complete a project.
- I can safely utilize tools and materials to complete a project.
Product Targets
- I can successfully complete a tower/bridge for destructive testing.
- I can complete the construction of a wing for testing.
- I can successfully build a rocket for testing.
- I can successfully utilize the injection molder to manufacturing a golf tee.
Proficiency Scale
| Score |
|
Description |
Assessed Evidence
|
| 4.0 |
Demonstrates understanding of grade level standards consistently and independently.
- Displays a very high quality
- Performs with a 100% accuracy
- Applies the learning very accurately
- Meets expectations on all standards
|
- Perfect Marks on performance assessments
- Perfect marks on all of the module paper work or enrichment activities.
- 100% on Post Test
|
| |
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
| 3.0 |
Demonstrates understanding of grade level standards consistently and independently.
- Displays high quality
- Performs with high accuracy
- Applies the learning accurately
- Meets expectations on most standards
|
- High Marks on performance assessments
- High marks on nearly all of the module paper work or enrichment activities.
- 90-99% on Post Test
|
| |
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
| 2.0 |
Demonstrates partial understanding of grade level standards with or without support.
- Displays basic quality
- Performs with inconsistent accuracy
- Applies the learning at a basic level
- Partially meets expectations on all standards
|
- Mix of upper marks on performance assessments.
- High marks on nearly all of the module paper work and enrichment activities.
- 80 -89% on Post Test.
|
| |
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
| 1.0 |
Demonstrates minimal understanding and does not meet grade level standards, even with support.
- Displays limited quality
- Performs with limited accuracy
- Applies the learning at a minimal level
- Does not meet expectations on some standards
|
- Mix of middle marks on performance assessments.
- Mix of middle marks on nearly all of the module paper work and enrichment activities.
- 70-79%on Post Test.
|
| |
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
| 0.0 |
Even with help, the student demonstrates no understanding or skill. |
|
Resources
Click for Synergistic Modules overview
|
|
TEC-MS.02.mod
|
Middle School (TEC) Targeted Standards
Standard 2 Core Concepts of Technology:
Connect the core concepts of technology.
TEC-MS.02.mod Module Score for Core Concepts of Technology.
Modules which address this standard - May include - Audio Broadcasting, Confident Consumer, Digital Transporation, and Geometric Packing.
*All Modules may not be available at all Middle Schools
|
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
- I can find the surface area of a standard object
- I can find the volume of a standard three-dimensional object.
- I can recite the Honeycomb Conjecture.
- I can define what a tessellation is.
- I can explain the difference between news and commentary.
- I can give an example of a unit of measure for length, mass or weight, and volume.
Reasoning Targets
- I can explain the difference between the greatest common divisor, (gcd) and the least common divisor.
- I can explain what occurs when an object is warped as opposed to when it is torn.
- I can explain how transformations using dilations are used to expand and contract objects.
- I can explain the process used to record and apply effects to a commercial which I produce.
- I can explain the concepts of North, South, East, and West as related to Earth.
- I can explain the relationship of degrees and minutes as related to latitude and longitude.
Skills (Performance) Targets
- I can find a Fibonacci number based on the Fibonacci sequence.
- I can build Pascal's triangle
- I can rotate, reflect, and translate a figure by hand as well as characterize a polygon.
- I can identify the coordinates of any point on a coordinate grid.
- I can explain how an object's coordinates are affected by rotation, reflection, and/or translation.
- I can explain how to calculate unit price.
- I can calculate the unit price, given an item's price and size.
- I can create an absorbancy ratio.
- I can create a strength ratio.
Product Targets
- I can complete a recording of a commercial.
Proficiency Scale
| Score |
|
Description |
Assessed Evidence
|
| 4.0 |
Demonstrates understanding of grade level standards consistently and independently.
- Displays a very high quality
- Performs with a 100% accuracy
- Applies the learning very accurately
- Meets expectations on all standards
|
- Perfect Marks on performance assessments
- Perfect marks on all of the module paper work or enrichment activities.
- 100% on Post Test
|
| |
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
| 3.0 |
Demonstrates understanding of grade level standards consistently and independently.
- Displays high quality
- Performs with high accuracy
- Applies the learning accurately
- Meets expectations on most standards
|
- High Marks on performance assessments
- High marks on nearly all of the module paper work or enrichment activities.
- 90-99% on Post Test
|
| |
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
| 2.0 |
Demonstrates partial understanding of grade level standards with or without support.
- Displays basic quality
- Performs with inconsistent accuracy
- Applies the learning at a basic level
- Partially meets expectations on all standards
|
- Mix of upper marks on performance assessments.
- High marks on nearly all of the module paper work and enrichment activities.
- 80 -89% on Post Test.
|
| |
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
| 1.0 |
Demonstrates minimal understanding and does not meet grade level standards, even with support.
- Displays limited quality
- Performs with limited accuracy
- Applies the learning at a minimal level
- Does not meet expectations on some standards
|
- Mix of middle marks on performance assessments.
- Mix of middle marks on nearly all of the module paper work and enrichment activities.
- 70-79%on Post Test.
|
| |
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
| 0.0 |
Even with help, the student demonstrates no understanding or skill. |
Resources
Click for Synergistic Modules overview
|
|
TEC-MS.02.T
ND CTE Standards
Technology Education Targeted Benchmarks
Standard 02: Core Concepts of Technology
TEC-MS.02.T Connect how different technologies involve different sets of processes.
|
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
- I can list the steps in the universal systems model
Reasoning Targets
- I can illustrate and label the universal systems model
Application Targets
- I can apply the universal systems model to a project
Proficiency Scale 6th Grade
|
Score 4.0
|
This score is not attainable for this course
|
Sample Activities
|
|
Score 3.0
|
The student:
- Applies the universal systems model to the different categories of technology.
|
Have students create a model of the universal system.
|
|
|
2.5
|
No major errors or omissions regarding 2.0 content and partial knowledge of the 3.0 content.
|
|
|
Score 2.0
|
There are no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes as the student:
- recognizes or recalls specific terminology, such as:
- input, process, output, feedback
However, the student exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes.
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
Partial knowledge of the 2.0 content, but major errors or omissions regarding the 3.0 content.
|
|
|
Score 1.0
|
With help, a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes and some of the more complex ideas and processes.
|
|
|
0.5
|
With help, a partial understanding of the 2.0 content, but not the 3.0 content.
|
|
Score 0.0
|
Even with help, no understanding or skill demonstrated.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Resources
Vocabulary
Websites
|
|
TEC-MS.03.E
ND CTE Standards
Technology Eduction Targeted Benchmarks
Standard 03: Technology Relationships
TEC-MS.03.E Illustrate how a product, system, or environment developed for one setting may be applied to another setting.
|
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
Reasoning Targets
Skills (Performance) Targets
Product Targets
Proficiency Scale
| Score |
|
Description |
Sample Activity
|
| 4.0 |
In addition to Score 3.0, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding more complex material that go beyond end of instruction expectations. |
- |
| |
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
| 3.0 |
“The Standard.” The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and processes that were end of instruction expectations. |
- |
| |
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
| 2.0 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
| |
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
| 1.0 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and some of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
- |
| |
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
| 0.0 |
Even with help, the student demonstrates no understanding or skill. |
- |
Resources
Websites
Vocabulary |
|
TEC-MS.03.mod
|
Middle School (TEC) Targeted Standards
Standard 3 Technology Relationships:
Interpret the relationships among technologies and the connections between technology and other fields of study.
TEC-MS.03.mod Module Score for Technology Relationships.
Modules which address this standard - May include - Electricity, Electronics, and Geometric Packing
*All Modules may not be available at all Middle Schools
|
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
- I can define the terms voltage, resistance, current, and circuit.
- can explain how electricity is related to electrons and protons.
- I can define insulator as it relates to electricity.
- I can define conductor as it relates to electricity.
- I can find the surface area of a standard object.
- I can find the volume of a standard three-dimensional object.
- I can recite the Honeycomb Conjecture.
- I can define what a tessellation is.
Reasoning Targets
- I can define and give an example of static electricity.
- I can define, draw, and wire a series circuit.
- I can define, draw, and wire a parallel circuit.
- I can state Ohm’s law and use it to calculate voltage, resistance, and current.
- I can explain how total resistance in a series circuit relates to the value of each resistor.
- I can explain the difference between the greatest common divisor, or gcd, and the least
- I can explain what occurs when an object is warped as opposed to when it is torn.
- I can explain how transformations using dialations are used to expand and contract objects.
Skills (Performance) Targets
- I can assemble a circuit on the circuit board.
- I can demonstrate the proper care of a digital multimeter.
- I can identify insulators and conductors in the classroom, other than those on the sample board.
- I can find a Fibonacci number based on the Fibonacci sequence.
- I can build Pascal’s triangle.
- I can rotate, reflect, and translate a figure by hand as well as characterize a polygon.
- I can identify the coordinates of any point on a coordinate grid.
- I can explain how an object’s coordinates are affected by a rotation, reflection, and/or translation.
Product Targets
- I can demonstrate proper use and safety of the soldering iron.
- I can solder successfully the end of a practice wire.
- I can assemble a solderless circuit.
Proficiency Scale
| Score |
|
Description |
Assessed Evidence
|
| 4.0 |
Demonstrates understanding of grade level standards consistently and independently.
- Displays a very high quality
- Performs with a 100% accuracy
- Applies the learning very accurately
- Meets expectations on all standards
|
- Perfect Marks on performance assessments
- Perfect marks on all of the module paper work or enrichment activities.
- 100% on Post Test
|
| |
3.5 |
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, the student demonstrates in-depth inferences and applications regarding the more complex content with partial success. |
| 3.0 |
Demonstrates understanding of grade level standards consistently and independently.
- Displays high quality
- Performs with high accuracy
- Applies the learning accurately
- Meets expectations on most standards
|
- High Marks on performance assessments
- High marks on nearly all of the module paper work or enrichment activities.
- 90-99% on Post Test
|
| |
2.5 |
The student demonstrates no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
| 2.0 |
Demonstrates partial understanding of grade level standards with or without support.
- Displays basic quality
- Performs with inconsistent accuracy
- Applies the learning at a basic level
- Partially meets expectations on all standards
|
- Mix of upper marks on performance assessments.
- High marks on nearly all of the module paper work and enrichment activities.
- 80 -89% on Post Test.
|
| |
1.5 |
The student demonstrates partial knowledge of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and procedures (Score 3.0 content). |
| 1.0 |
Demonstrates minimal understanding and does not meet grade level standards, even with support.
- Displays limited quality
- Performs with limited accuracy
- Applies the learning at a minimal level
- Does not meet expectations on some standards
|
- Mix of middle marks on performance assessments.
- Mix of middle marks on nearly all of the module paper work and enrichment activities.
- 70-79%on Post Test.
|
| |
0.5 |
With help, the student demonstrates a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes (Score 2.0 content) but not the more complex ideas and processes (Score 3.0 content). |
| 0.0 |
Even with help, the student demonstrates no understanding or skill. |
|
Resources
Click for Synergistic Modules overview |
|
TEC-MS.04.D
ND CTE Standards
Technology Education Targeted Benchmarks
Standard 04: Effects of Technology
TEC-MS.04.D Show how the use of technology affects humans in various ways (safety, comfort, choices, and attitudes) about technology's development and use.
|
Student Learning Targets:
Reasoning Targets
- I can explain that the use of technology affects humans in various ways, including their safety, comfort, choices, and attitudes about technology’s development and use.
- I can explain why technology, by itself, is neither good nor bad, but decisions about the use of products and systems can result in desirable or undesirable consequences.
Proficiency Scale 6th Grade
|
Score 4.0
|
This score is not attainable for this course
|
Sample Activities
|
|
Score 3.0
|
The student:
- applies his or her understanding of people’s decisions regarding technology and how it affects society as a whole.
- explains how technology, by itself, is neither good nor bad, or how the use can result in desirable and undesirable consequences.
- differentiates between global and personal perspective.
|
Technological encounters (worksheet/activity)
|
|
|
2.5
|
No major errors or omissions regarding 2.0 content and partial knowledge of the 3.0 content.
|
|
|
Score 2.0
|
There are no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes as the student:
- recognizes or recalls specific terminology: cultural, social, economic, ethical, and political effects
- applies his or her understanding of people’s decisions regarding technology and how it affects them personally.
However, the student exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes.
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
Partial knowledge of the 2.0 content, but major errors or omissions regarding the 3.0 content.
|
|
|
Score 1.0
|
With help, a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes and some of the more complex ideas and processes.
|
|
|
0.5
|
With help, a partial understanding of the 2.0 content, but not the 3.0 content.
|
|
Score 0.0
|
Even with help, no understanding or skill demonstrated.
|
Resources
Websites
Vocabulary |
|
TEC-MS.04.E
ND CTE Standards
Technology Education Targeted Benchmarks
Standard 04: Effects of Technology
TEC-MS.04.E Examine how technology, by itself, is neither good nor bad, but decisions about the use of products and systems can result in desirable or undesirable consequences.
|
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
- I can list products that can have either a negative or a positive impact on society.
Reasoning Targets
- I can differentiate between desirable and undesirable outcomes of technology.
- I can recognize that all technology has the potential to have positive and/or negative results.
Proficiency Scale Grade 6
|
Score 4.0
|
This score is not attainable for this course
|
Sample Activities
|
|
Score 3.0
|
The student:
- applies his or her understanding of people’s decisions regarding technology and how it affects society as a whole.
- explains how technology, by itself, is neither good nor bad, or how the use can result in desirable and undesirable consequences.
- differentiates between global and personal perspective.
|
Technological encounters (worksheet/activity)
|
|
|
2.5
|
No major errors or omissions regarding 2.0 content and partial knowledge of the 3.0 content.
|
|
|
Score 2.0
|
There are no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes as the student:
- recognizes or recalls specific terminology: cultural, social, economic, ethical, and political effects
- applies his or her understanding of people’s decisions regarding technology and how it affects them personally.
However, the student exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes.
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
Partial knowledge of the 2.0 content, but major errors or omissions regarding the 3.0 content.
|
|
|
Score 1.0
|
With help, a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes and some of the more complex ideas and processes.
|
|
|
0.5
|
With help, a partial understanding of the 2.0 content, but not the 3.0 content.
|
|
Score 0.0
|
Even with help, no understanding or skill demonstrated.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Resources
Websites
Vocabulary |
|
TEC-MS.04.F
ND CTE Standards
Technology Education Targeted Benchmarks
Standard 04: Effects of Technology
TEC-MS.04.F Determine how the development and use of technology poses ethical issues.
|
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
- I can recognize that all technology has the potential to have positive and/or negative results.
- I can cite instances where the development of technology has posed ethical issues in society.
Reasoning Targets
- I can defend a decision to use or not to use a piece of technology as it poses ethical issues.
Profiency Scale 6th Grade
|
Score 4.0
|
This score is not attainable for this course
|
Sample Activities
|
|
Score 3.0
|
The student:
- applies his or her understanding of people’s decisions regarding technology and how it affects society as a whole.
- explains how technology, by itself, is neither good nor bad, or how the use can result in desirable and undesirable consequences.
- differentiates between global and personal perspective.
|
Technological encounters (worksheet/activity)
|
|
|
2.5
|
No major errors or omissions regarding 2.0 content and partial knowledge of the 3.0 content.
|
|
|
Score 2.0
|
There are no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes as the student:
- recognizes or recalls specific terminology: cultural, social, economic, ethical, and political effects
- applies his or her understanding of people’s decisions regarding technology and how it affects them personally.
However, the student exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes.
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
Partial knowledge of the 2.0 content, but major errors or omissions regarding the 3.0 content.
|
|
|
Score 1.0
|
With help, a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes and some of the more complex ideas and processes.
|
|
|
0.5
|
With help, a partial understanding of the 2.0 content, but not the 3.0 content.
|
|
Score 0.0
|
Even with help, no understanding or skill demonstrated.
|
Resources
Websites
Vocabulary |
|
TEC-MS.04.G
ND CTE Standards
Technology Education Targeted Benchmarks
Standard 04: Effects of Technology
TEC-MS.04.G Identify economic, political, and cultural issues influenced by the development and use of technology.
|
Student Learning Targets:
Knowledge Targets
- I can cite instances where the development of technology has had an impact on the economy.
- I can cite instances where the development of technology has had an impact on the culture of a society.
Proficiency Scale 6th Grade
|
Score 4.0
|
This score is not attainable for this course
|
Sample Activities
|
|
Score 3.0
|
The student:
- applies his or her understanding of people’s decisions regarding technology and how it affects society as a whole.
- explains how technology, by itself, is neither good nor bad, or how the use can result in desirable and undesirable consequences.
- differentiates between global and personal perspective.
|
Technological encounters (worksheet/activity)
|
|
|
2.5
|
No major errors or omissions regarding 2.0 content and partial knowledge of the 3.0 content.
|
|
|
Score 2.0
|
There are no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes as the student:
- recognizes or recalls specific terminology: cultural, social, economic, ethical, and political effects
- applies his or her understanding of people’s decisions regarding technology and how it affects them personally.
However, the student exhibits major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes.
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
Partial knowledge of the 2.0 content, but major errors or omissions regarding the 3.0 content.
|
|
|
Score 1.0
|
With help, a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes and some of the more complex ideas and processes.
|
|
|
0.5
|
With help, a partial understanding of the 2.0 content, but not the 3.0 content.
|
|
Score 0.0
|
Even with help, no understanding or skill demonstrated.
|
Resources
Websites
Vocabulary |
|
